Yorgos Lanthimos’ “Poor Things” has stirred conversation since its release.  This darkly comedic film, based on the novel by Alasdair Gray, offers a unique blend of historical fiction, sci-fi elements, and a dash of Victorian-era social commentary.  

Naturally, this unconventional approach has led to a diverse range of reviews, sparking intrigue and debate among viewers.

This article delves into the critical reception of “Poor Things,” exploring both the praise and criticism it has received.  We’ll analyze what reviewers found effective, what elements divided audiences, and how the film stacks up against Lanthimos’ previous works.

A Symphony of Performances: Critics Applaud the Acting

One aspect of “Poor Things” that receives consistent praise is the outstanding acting. The cast, led by Emma Stone, delivers captivating performances that breathe life into Lanthimos’ eccentric characters:

Emma Stone’s Chameleon Turn:  

Critics laud Stone’s portrayal of Belle Baxter, a young woman resurrected with the brain of a fetus.  They highlight her ability to navigate the complexities of the character, from childlike innocence to a newfound sense of agency.  Stone’s commitment to the role is evident, and reviewers commend her comedic timing and emotional depth.

Mark Ruffalo’s Grumpy Charm:  

Mark Ruffalo, playing outcast scientist Dr. Wakenshott, receives praise for his endearing portrayal.  Despite the character’s eccentricities, Ruffalo manages to inject humor and vulnerability, creating a well-rounded character that resonates with viewers.

Supporting Cast Shines:  

The supporting cast, including Willem Dafoe and Jerrod Carmichael, also garners positive reviews.  Reviewers acknowledge their contributions to the film’s overall atmosphere and narrative.

A Feast for the Eyes: Visual Storytelling Praised

Lanthimos is known for his distinct visual style, and “Poor Things” is no exception.  Cinematography and production design are lauded by many reviewers who find the film visually stunning:

A Period Piece with a Twist:  

The film’s setting in Victorian England is meticulously recreated with a touch of surrealism.  Costumes and set design are praised for their historical accuracy while incorporating subtle elements that hint at the film’s offbeat nature.

Lanthimos’ Signature Style:  

Reviewers familiar with Lanthimos’ previous works recognize his signature style in “Poor Things.”  The use of wide-angle shots, unusual framing, and a muted color palette contributes to the film’s unsettling yet captivating atmosphere.

Humor with a Bite: Comedy Divides Audiences

While the acting and visuals are widely appreciated, the film’s humor is a point of contention for some viewers. Lanthimos’ brand of dark comedy, often characterized by awkward silences and deadpan delivery, may not resonate with everyone:

An Acquired Taste:  

Reviewers who enjoy Lanthimos’ previous works find the humor in “Poor Things” sharp and thought-provoking.  They appreciate the film’s ability to blend humor with social commentary, creating a unique viewing experience.

Lost in Translation:  

Some viewers criticize the film’s humor as too dry or bizarre.  The deadpan delivery and unconventional jokes might not land for everyone, leaving some viewers feeling confused or alienated.

Thematic Depth or Superficial Shock?

Thematic elements are another area where reviews diverge.  While some find the film thought-provoking, others view it as more style than substance:

A Feminist Lens:  

Critics who appreciate the film see it as a commentary on Victorian-era societal expectations and the treatment of women.  They praise the film’s exploration of gender roles, identity, and free will.

Shock Value Over Substance:  

Some reviewers find the film’s subject matter and dark humor exploitative. They argue that the film leans too heavily on shocking moments without offering a deeper exploration of its themes.

Lanthimos’ Legacy: Where Does “Poor Things” Stand?

“Poor Things” adds another chapter to Lanthimos’ filmography.  While it doesn’t achieve the universal acclaim of some of his previous works like “The Lobster” or “Dogtooth,” it remains a bold and visually striking film:

A Faithful Adaptation?  

Comparisons with the source material are inevitable.  While the film takes some creative liberties, critics acknowledge it captures the essence of the novel’s dark humor and unconventional narrative.

A Director’s Vision:  

Ultimately, “Poor Things” is a testament to Lanthimos’ unique vision.  Whether viewers embrace or reject his style, there’s no denying this film is a distinct and thought-provoking piece of cinema.

FAQs

Q: What is the overall critical reception for “Poor Things”?

“Poor Things” received generally positive reviews, with praise for its visual style, Emma Stone’s performance, and the darkly comedic tone. However, some critics found the narrative pacing uneven.

Q: Did major publications like Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic give “Poor Things” a good score?

On Rotten Tomatoes, “Poor Things” holds a score of 72% based on critic reviews, indicating a “fresh” rating. Metacritic assigned a score of 65 out of 100, signifying “generally favorable reviews.”

Q: Did audiences generally enjoy “Poor Things”?

Audience reception seems divided. Some viewers found it a visually stunning and thought-provoking experience, while others were turned off by the dark humor and unconventional plot.

Q: Where can I find audience reviews for “Poor Things”?

Websites like Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, and Metacritic allow users to leave their own reviews. Social media platforms like Twitter can also offer audience reactions.

Q: What genre would you classify “Poor Things” under?

“Poor Things” is a dark comedy with elements of science fiction, historical fiction, and romance.

Q: Are there any similar films I can watch if I enjoyed “Poor Things”?

If you enjoyed the film, you might like other movies by Yorgos Lanthimos, such as “The Lobster” and “The Favourite.” Other darkly comedic films with a historical setting could also be of interest.

Q: Is “Poor Things” a good film for everyone?

Due to its mature themes, dark humor, and some violence, “Poor Things” might not be suitable for all audiences. Consider checking reviews for content warnings before watching.

Q: Where can I stream or watch “Poor Things”?

Availability depends on your region and streaming services. Check with your preferred streaming platform or VOD service to see if “Poor Things” is available.

Q: Is there a director’s cut or extended version of “Poor Things”?

There’s no official confirmation of a director’s cut or extended version as of June 2024.

Q: Was “Poor Things” based on a book?

Yes, the film is an adaptation of the novel of the same name by Scottish author Alasdair Gray.

Q: Who directed “Poor Things”?

The film was directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, a Greek filmmaker known for his unique and unsettling style.

Q: Who wrote the screenplay for “Poor Things”?

The screenplay was written by Tony McNamara, who also collaborated with Lanthimos on “The Favourite.”

To read more click here